For centuries there has been debate whether a god or higher power exists, but as mankind’s technological and scientific knowledge increases, evidence may be leaning towards the absence of such beings, which is causing the religious community to believe that religion’s influence may be waning, and that many are losing faith due to these discoveries that conflict with their faith. Some individuals believe that alternatives should be taught over these discoveries in order to sustain a religious influence on children and some of these individuals actions are causing controversy. One such controversy familiar to our generation is the teaching of evolution (the scientific theory that all species evolve from lower forms over thousands of years) versus that of Intelligent Design (the science of creationism/the belief that God created the Earth and all the happy animals on it) in schools. The controversy became nationally recognized once a federal court case was made over the issue: Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005), when the plaintiff, Kitzmiller, successfully challenged a school district against making Intelligent Design a required learning. The federal court in the case deemed it unconstitutional on the basis that it conflicts with the first amendment’s Establishment clause. Although there is irrefutable evidence supporting evolution, there are those who insist that creationism is the only answer. In a poll: Gallup sample of 1,001 adults (Mar. 21-23, 2005), over 90% of 1,001 conservatives claimed they would be more upset if evolution was taught over Intelligent Design. In a recent press release, President Bush himself stated that he believes Intelligent Design should be taught in schools. While there is scientific proof that evolution is a valid natural occurrence, many still and may never consider the facts, where as Intelligent Design is not really science, another reason why it is not taught in schools.Personally, I believe an individual has the right to believe whatever he/she wants, and all beliefs should be tolerated and respected, unless of course they are inhumane and encourage harm to other living things. Essentially, the issue lies within our rights, if an American citizen does not want themselves or their children to be subject to only one idea of how the universe came to be, then so be it. This restriction allows the option of freedom of choice, is that not what our constitutional rights promise us? I may be one of the least patriotic people I know, but the freedom of choice is not something I take for granted. If I want to sit in front of the television and eat Cheetos instead of going to church Sunday morning, than I am going to do it. Thank you America.